Published on March 24, 2019 |
March 24, 2019 jo Kurt Lowder
The average picture of the Y model is likely to look like a sedan. Some broader markets did not respond well to Model Y because it does not look like a traditional SUV. To constructively criticize the Teslo, it may have been wise to call the Y model "crossover" ever. Missing his trapezoidal shape. I have to admit that when I saw Model Y, my heart sank. My initial reaction was that there was no SUV! It needs a redesigned last page! I wrote a critical article, but I decided not to submit it because I thought I jumped with a gun and many more CleanTechnica the writers were in Model Y.
A few days later, I completely changed my mind. Article dr. Mad Max Holland on the size of the Y model, along with Paul Fosse's third-line article, helped. Below is a picture of Max, showing the difference between model 3 and model Y.
In the last week I obsessively watched and read many reviews from people who got a test drive in the Y model. They were all enchanted by a new glass roof that does not have a central pillar. In Model 3, the glass roof is two glass pieces separated by a large horizontal column. The general consensus is that the Model Y on the inside feels much larger than the outside. This was specially designed, said Elon Musk in a tweet.
In addition, the glass roof acquires a few centimeters of height compared to the average upholstered and insulated metal roof. The Tesla Y models show that "the expansive glass roof provides more space for the head and UV protection."
Here you can see the second and third row seats that fold down to create 66 cubic meters of storage space. For comparison I have RAV4, which has 72 cubic meters. (I plan to sell it soon after I omit the ownership of the vehicle for transport as a service). I like my RAV4 and I was hoping to get an electric version, but they were stopped after a short test run. I'm 6 '4'; and I can completely lay it down when the seats are folded, which makes it possible for camping and sleeping on epic road trips. I expect that I can do the same in Y, because it can be 2 centimeters longer than RAV4 based on unofficial reports.
I was hoping that the Y model would have the same space as my RAV4 and it looks pretty close. From the best I can see, the sloping rear is crucial for aerodynamics. The Y model shines in this section, with a resistance coefficient of 0.23 compared to a 0.31 Toyota RAV4. (Lower than the vehicle, the more efficient the vehicle is).
This week I'm in the house, and my sister's living room is twice as big as the entire wall is glassy. House guests are fascinated by the view of this sustainable home. Watching TV is especially enjoyable, although it's sometimes difficult to stay focused, because your mind is asking in the clouds.
In addition to trying to earn points from my sister, I mention this effect because the same concept with the Y model. The glass roof is so unique that consumers can forget about the trapezoidal shape they usually use with the SUV. segment. It will set a new precedent in the automotive world. They have the saying that everything in Texas is getting bigger. Well, here in Austin, a thoughtful and intelligent design can give you this feeling without having to use as many resources.
To continue this discussion, let's look at another popular electric SUV, the Hyundai Kona EV. It has a resistance coefficient of 0.32 – we remember that the model 3 has a resistance coefficient of 0.23. The length of the Kone is 13.7 meters, and the unofficial length of the Y model is 15.4 meters.
It is shocking that the Hyundai Kona EV has a small cargo space of 45.8 cubic meters, while the Tesla Y 66 cubic meters of cargo space has a model.
Our YouTube friends on "Like Tesla" also have an excellent video in the Y model, which helps the vehicle to become more revealing – no, in the dark. (See also their videos and video events.) Like Tesla is a great YouTube channel that I highly recommend. I hope Kim will persuade my sister to get Model Y. Then I hope that in a few years when the sister needs me in the houses, I can only send the Model Y to pick me up because I stopped driving.
Kia Niro (above) has a slightly more conventional SUV look. However, this brings huge costs. Niro has a lower coefficient of 0.30 and only 53 cubic meters of cargo space with lowered rear seats. Once again, the Tesla Y model is much better, with a coefficient of resistance of 0.23 and a load space of 66 cubic meters.
So the Y model will have 13 cubic meters of storage space, but it will still be much more aerodynamic. This video gives a nice breakdown of storage capacity with another type of seat for Niro EV and compares its statistics with other popular EVs.
The next is Audi e-tron, with a resistance coefficient of 0.28 and a load of only 57 cubic meters. Even at $ 72,000 + I can not find an electric crossover SUV with more load space than the Y model.
The Kia Soul EV has a traditional SUV, but its coefficient of resistance is 0.35 and the cargo space is only 49.5 cubic meters. In addition, it is only 13.5 meters long. There is nothing in the back of this car, at least for me.
We can count on Tesla to do the right thing instead of the light. The simple thing is to build a small SUV version and keep its inefficient design, as people have become accustomed to it. The right thing to do is to make a crossover that has the best combination of volume, volume, safety features, autonomy and aerodynamic design. Tesla could make it look like a traditional SUV that would fit the taste of the consumer, but this would bring costs. Tesla instead chose the function and durability of the usual shape.
It's a simple physics! This is the model on which it is based first principles, and not what everyone else does. You do not do SUVs like everyone else. Instead, think of the most aerodynamic / safe shape, and then modify this shape as little as possible to create a functional and comfortable space for travelers. Then continue creating with other materials (glass) to offer even more headroom and exceptional feeling expansiveness.
We hope that Tesla can change the traditional look at the shape of SUVs it should be. The shape is simply a more sustainable form. This shape can be increased in the future because the batteries are cheaper and denser. Of course, the X model is essentially a larger version of the Y model (with decorative doors). This form will make more sense in physics.
It is worth trying to make Tesla create a paradigm shift in terms of how the SUV looks. Nevertheless, I informally inform the future model G, as in Giant, to compete with Chevy Suburban. He can fly "like the G6" (this is a private jet). Such a vehicle will certainly be possible in the future. It could be financed from Y. revenue. It could also be the basis for self-service daily migrants. Hopefully, the top model of the Y model will not be anywhere. If the physicist has his own words, he will not.
I'm sorry that I can not provide you with more precise details about how important the last model of the Y model is for its resistance coefficient. It was not because of lack of effort. However, I know that a drop of water approaches the ideal shape of an aerodynamic car, and this is a likely reason for the sloping pattern of the Y model and the entire S.3.X.Y. settle. This is something I think Tesla could better explain in the presentation, but it's kind of obvious when we look at S.3.X.Y. models at a time. This basic design is supposedly a timeless principle, such as a transport wheel, and an arc for architecture.
You can claim that Tesla should do what everyone else is doing. But I think Tesla has done the right thing. The advantage is as follows:
1.) AUTONOMY !!
I have autonomy at # 1 because it covers the other three. Autonomous cars will be drastically safer, more sustainable, and have the most important functions that a vehicle can have. We must remember the long-term goal of Tesla, which is the development of taxis, buses and semi-trailers. Sales revenue S.3.X.Y. Models will finance a future in which most people and businesses will use taxis, buses and semi-trailers (in conjunction with other forms of public transport). Transport as a service will be significantly more sustainable, safer and more appropriate for our future cities. And it's S.3.X.Y. which will improve self-evaluation technology, so most of us in the future will not have their own cars. Over time, we can save thousands of dollars every year if we decide not to have a car. Of course, the division is more sustainable.
I think that Tesla is extremely smart to insert hardware into each Y model. The company does not know who will later buy the software. Additional revenue from software packages will be considerable. But in the next few years, it is most important that we have as many Tesla vehicles as possible to collect data for training the self-coding software. Tesla has probably ~ 99% of the autonomous kilometers of all self-employed vehicles. This lead is growing every day.
Tesla could make a slightly larger SUV, then he would have fewer resources to use in self-technology. Probably could not afford to place hardware in all Ys models. I am convinced that almost all Model Ys will be upgraded over time on a self-run basis. Some will probably trade with them and will themselves become drivers. No other car sales company sells cars that have the ability to earn a lot after selling.
Designing the Model Y will attract the most customers, while achieving the four above-mentioned factors (goals). Let's hope that other vehicle companies will get acquainted with a much improved aerodynamics, such as the Y model and the entire S.3.X.Y. presentation. A resistance coefficient of 0.23 or less could become a norm. Part of Tesla's importance is that this norm is desirable, as opposed to being required by some government regulation in some form or manner.
Last week, I thought Tesla would have to change the Y model to look like another SUV. This week I hope that our opinion on how the SUV looks like will be permanently changed with the Tesla Y. In addition, the long length of the Tesla Y model is not only more spacious, aerodynamic and efficient, but also providing larger areas of crushing that we are safe in accidents.
Considering what needs to be done in order to be safe and sustainable, the Tesla Y model is a big step forward in technology. I think this will eventually become more obvious. So stay with us.
As an addition, I would like to mention the following: I try to read as many comments CleanTechnica maybe. Many years ago he became a full-time hobby. Some commentators believe that we have an unfair bias against Tesla. I would like to address this criticism. We are independent writers who are spread all over the world and almost all of us have daily jobs. I write about what inspires me, and what I think is most important. Recently I thought that Tesla made toys for the rich. This is the opposite of the truth, as I learned, which you can read here: Why is Tesla buying the best thing you can do for the environment?.
Related: Tesla Model Y crushes the "premium" fossil SUV Coupe