The news that the EU plans to ban artificial grass from 2022 was skeptical. Now the EU seeks to make it clear that such a ban is not the subject of a debate.
– Some newspapers say that the EU wants to ban artificial plots. This is not true, they write in their official Twitter account.
On Monday, several newspapers, including the VG, reported that the EU would ban artificial grass for two and a half years after the German Welt am Sonntag first mentioned the case.
According to Aftenposten, the EU had to warn Tuesday that it was a rubber granulate, not an artificial grass. These are black rubber blackberries that the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) wants to remove, some of which include The Guardian of 2019.
"We are generally thinking about how best to eliminate the effects of microplastics on the environment and health, and to encourage the development of other options," said a representative of the European Commission.
This is no surprise to the head of the NFF, Ole Myhrvold.
– Much of what has been written is wrong. I tried to explain that it does not apply to artificial grass, but that granules can be banned. These can be floor tires or new plastic balls, says Myhrvold.
In a letter from UEFA to the EU that Aftenposten got access, it is clear what the European Football Federation believes in the matter.
115.5 million hours of track capacity and 27.6 million fewer footballers are some of the consequences of the ban, we believe in the letter.
According to a survey conducted by the Synthetic Council of Turfs, the replacement of 17,000 artificial meadows will require 85,000 new natural gas routes, Aftenposten writes.
Rumors about banning artificial lawns have caused reactions in football Norway. The daily director of Tromsø IL, Kristian Høydal, was among the most critical.
– Then we have to start another sport, he has repaired.
Ole Myhrvold also does not believe that a ban is viable, but says that they are working hard to find alternatives.
– Much is happening, so we hope to get a product that we will be satisfied with. The challenge has so far been the price and that it was not good enough for games and maintenance.
Do you have this environmental warning?
Disputed environmental debate
Only Åråsen, Haugesund, Lerkendal, Brann and Nadderud have a natural grass in their elite series. In addition, the Arena Arena Ullevaal is a natural grass.
The vulcanized rubber is considered to be microplastic and can not be broken down in nature. Microplasticity is considered one of the main environmental trends.
– For our biggest sports, football, it is unacceptable to be one of the biggest contaminants in Norway, said Rasmus Hansson TV 2 at that time.
However, this claim was rejected by Ole Myhrvold in the NFF, referring to the report of the Danish Institute of Technology, to which UEFA refers in its statement on the consultation.
– Microplasticity is probably an important environmental problem, but artificial grass plots contribute very little to this. You will find all the important emissions around the route, where the snow was milled across the fence around the track. The granules of the car tires are harder than water and will sit in sand traps around the track and will not end in the ocean as required, says.
Director of Communications at the NFF Svein Graff mentions the ban on the artificial lawn of 2022 as "unrealistic", but now it seems to be right.
– We are striving to reduce grain waste and have introduced several measures, such as the On the Line Campaign. We run clubs and organize courses where we present the measures they can take in their path, said the director of communications at the NFF Svein Graff.
Commercial cooperation: codes for discounts