Warp Charge VS Other Quick Billing Standards – A 30-minute Charge Test


The unique edition of OnePlus 6T McLaren has brought a new standard for charging OnePlus, which has managed to reach a 20W Dash Charger. So, with Chinese phone manufacturers who bring more own billing standards, we want to show how they compare with other standards on the market.

There are a number of fast billing standards in the smartphone industry that have their own strengths and weaknesses. In short, fast charging is great and convenient for the customer, but the owner's billing standards mean that you can get these speeds only with the original cable and adapter.

OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition with Warp Charge 30

We've prepared some charts with some quick billing standards and have them interconnected. Note that for this comparison, we only compare how quickly the device recharges in the first half hour of a dead battery. This is most important to assess how long you can expect from the device if you only have 30 minutes to charge it during the flight or before you need to open the door.

The raw data we use is the percentage for a 30-minute charge from a dead battery, battery capacity, and just for fun. For this comparison, we will also include the results of battery durability.

The first diagram is the average charge percentage after charging for 30 minutes. Of course, the percentage depends on the total battery capacity and the transmission speed of the strong current on the battery.

To the right of the stick, Oppo Find X's Super VOOC is indispensable. Half an hour filled with an impressive 95% of the battery. In the meantime, Google Pixel 2XL with a 18W USB-PD charger reached only 35%, with the Samsung Galaxy Note9 not too far ahead, with 37% using the Adaptive Fast Charger.

Oppo Find X Lamborghini Edition with Super VOOC

This next chart estimates how much battery capacity is updated based on the percentage and capacity of the phone. Find X is now very close to the Huawei Mate 20 Pro, with Huawei having the largest battery (4,200 mAh). Meanwhile, Note9 and Pixel 2 XL are still the last.

Finally, the last chart takes into account the assessment of the durability of the batteries that we gave to these phones when we reviewed them. Simply put, this is our battery endurance rating for the amount of battery that the phone can charge in half an hour.

Mate 20 and Find X were next to another in the performance chart, but the endurance chart reflects the difference between the duration of the battery between the two devices – still very impressive numbers from Huawei.

Huawei Mate 20 Pro with Super Charge 40W

OnePlus 6T with Dash Charge in vivo Nex S and Quick Charge 3.0 were in the neck and neck filling test for 30 minutes, where they reached 55% and 50%. This brought about 2,000 mAh with approximately the same endurance ratings at 50 hours for each device.

vivo NEX S with Qualcomm Quick Charge 3 technology

Chinese brands are well ahead of other industry standards, such as USB-C Power Delivery and Qualcomm Quick Charge in smartphones, simply because competition between Chinese brands is so severe. We need to ask ourselves when the industry will be subject to the fast charging standard, which will reach the range 20W-25W.

USB-C Power Delivery is perhaps the most potential for an industry standard (after all, a lot of laptops are charged) and it's already quite difficult to find the USB-C PD power of the banks, and Apple uses the same standard on its laptops.

Until then, will we see which other phone designers will develop their proprietary billing standards outside of China?


Source link