In addition to the opposition of the successor of NATO's Wet Chiefs, the proposed gas pipeline gas pipeline is facing a new battle, which TransCanada says could jeopardize the project.
Last autumn, the National Energy Board (NEB) launched a multi-step process to determine if the pipeline of $ 4.8 billion should be under federal jurisdiction and may be subject to a further regulatory review, which may be delayed by the project for months.
The hearing has not yet been scheduled, but the national enforcement authorities have indicated several deadlines for lodging between January and March.
A 675-kilometer gas pipeline to move natural gas from Groundbirch, B.C., to Kitimat, B.C., for international exports, was approved by provincial officials by April 2016. It is owned by TransCanada Corp., now officially known as TC Energy.
But the members of the people Wet are sued in the north. who do not support the pipeline that crosses their territory, have set up camps with fortified checkpoints, banned workers from the road and bridge that they must cross for construction activities. This week, RCMP introduced a directive that allows workers access to the area.
The NEB case was initiated by Smithers, B.C., resident Michael Sawyer, an environmental consultant with more than two decades of experience in the Alberta energy sector, who believes that the project should fall under federal jurisdiction.
TransCanada Corp. in the applications lodged at the previous stage of the proceedings, said that if the national enforcement authorities had a whole issue of jurisdiction, this would have serious consequences.
"This would create regulatory insecurity and inefficiency at a time when these issues threaten Canada's global competitiveness," TransCanada said.
"This would bring real, tangible benefits to people in B.C., including the first nations, in danger."
The company said in a statement by e-mail that it was "disappointed" because of the NEB's decision of October 2018 to review the arguments on jurisdiction.
It has been said that the project has undergone a "strong biennial environmental and technical overview" through the B.C. regulatory system.
The status of interveners is assigned
NEB granted the federal government, B.C., Alberta and Saskatchewan the status of an intermediary in December last year.
Several energy companies involved in the project, such as Shell Canada and PetroChina Canada, which are part of the Joint Liquefied Natural Gas Terminal in Kitimat, also received an intervening status.
The wet "suwet" hereditary leadership, together with 11 other first peoples, requested the status of an intervening party in the first round of proceedings, but was rejected by the national enforcement body.
B.c. The Ministry of Energy and Mining did not submit comments, but in provinces it stated that the project is its responsibility.
A spokeswoman for Natural Resources Canada Vanessa Adams said in a statement via e-mail that the issue is dependent on NEB.
The government of Alberta did not respond to the request for comments.
Visit the Gidimt campus
Sawyer said that B.C. a judge who issued a court order requiring people in camps to stop workers from accessing the area before taking a decision did not have all the facts of the project.
"It's a crazy thing that the government knows my challenge and TransCanada, but it has not been mentioned," said Sawyer.
"It's very unusual to do these dramatic steps on a project that has a high risk of being considered illegal."
Sawyer said he supports the resistance of Wet's suicides to the natural gas project.
Last week, he visited the Gidimt camp and strewed hundreds of pounds of potatoes, carrots and onions along with coffee.
On Monday, the RCMP entered the Gidimt camp in order to enforce a lawsuit and arrest 14 people.
"Nothing creates better friends than a common enemy, and that's what we have," said Sawyer.
Relationship with Alberto?
The decision of the Supreme Court, known as Westcoast, created two tests to determine whether a gas pipeline, beginning and ending in the same province, should fall under federal jurisdiction.
Sawyer's argument depends on the first test, based on whether the project is "functionally integrated and subject to joint management, control and guidance," in line with the 1998 decision.
"This gas pipeline gas pipeline should be part of an interregional pipeline system that would bring gas from Alberta and northern B.C.
TransCanada challenges it.
The company states in its documents that the project will eventually be linked to the Nova Gas transmission system, which extends via Alberta and B.C., and that both operate independently. The company also said that there is currently no role in regulatory books for linking both systems.
When the company originally submitted the 2012 Coastline GasLink Project for Federal Environmental Assessment, she said that there would be "an interconnection with existing [Nova Gas Transmission] System in Groundbirch. "
After the conservative government of Stephen Harper changed the regulatory process and narrowed the types of projects covered by the federal review, the rating was stopped, so B.C. to approve it alone.
Sawyer is convinced that political machinations between Harper and the previous B.C. The Liberal Government, Christy Clark, lined up the tools to make this happen.
Elizabeth May, the head of the Federal Green Party, has the same doubts.
"This is definitely a complicated path for the Kitagina LNG project," he said in May, who did not get the status of an intervening NEB for the court case.
"In any case, I would like to properly analyze it; I would like to see that this would be challenged."