Wednesday , August 12 2020
Home / canada / Edmonton's police dismissed an officer who harassed a colleague

Edmonton's police dismissed an officer who harassed a colleague


Fiona Moffat in 2004


Edmonton's police fired an captain who was convicted of harassing a colleague, but later he did so with the investigators.

Const. Fiona Moffat was detained in the 22 years by the Edmonton Police Service (EPS), in accordance with a written decision by RCMP Supt. Fred Kamins, who chaired her two-month disciplinary hearing.

"This is now through the human resources of EPS," said police spokeswoman Cheryl Voordenhout on Friday.

The unique police association (EPA) disagrees with the decision and examines its options.

Kamins said Moffat's behavior "nothing scandalous".

"I have found that the wrong behavior in this case is particularly uncertain," he wrote. "Intentional harassment of a colleague contrary to police policy, procedures and acceptable social interaction at the workplace, which takes place over a nine-month time frame with … evidence of a similar misconduct against (two other officials) shows a substantial deficit."

More serious, Kamins wrote, it was Moffat's decision to cheat investigators during the examination of professional standards (PSBs) about their behavior.

"If this were the only violation," he wrote, "and this was recognized by the official and assumed responsibility early in the post-appeal procedure, I was convinced that he could survive the violation and that the rehabilitation was possible and appropriate. was not her chosen answer. "

"It has damaged its reputation in the community and the police service," he concluded. "Damaged the public reputation of the police service."

Moffat was accused of harassment by civilian assistant Romaine Fleck-Brezinsky, while both of them participated in the police communications service, which sent and evaluated 911 calls.

Fleck-Brezinski is former ex-policeman Kevin Brezinsky. In an interview, she said that she did not talk to him several times, but in 2016 left the police service.

Fleck-Brezinski worked at the branch for 11 years as a civil operator 911.

Initially there was a collegiate working environment in which breakfasts and a potluck of dinners were common. Moffat joined the unit in 2013 and initially there was no contradiction between the two, the hearing was heard. But Fleck-Brezinski soon noticed that a group of four constituents, including Moffat, began to behave differently around it. When she entered the room, Moffat turned. She felt as if she was a group effort to avoid her and other civilian collaborators.

She began to hear rumors that Moffat called "b-" and "c-" behind her back. At one point there was a hot dispute over the type of interior window blinds. There was also a breakfast incident that was cooked on Sunday morning, which Moffat and several other officers have refused to use in McDonald's takeout.

During the hearing Moffat tried to exclude Fleck-Brezina from life after hearing that she was spreading rumors that she, Moffat, had worked with her colleague.

At the hearing, she examined the examination of the 2014 e-mail message, in which Moffat expressed his resentment over the post on Facebook, which Fleck-Brezin did about the fraud of the revenue agency. Moffat was convinced that it was a breach of privacy.

"Wtf !!!" Moffat wrote: "I'm thinking about walking and I'm piercing my throat."

Fleck-Brezinski lodged a complaint on 5 January 2015.

"It was really scary," she said. "Suddenly, this excellent work that I loved changed, and that was really a toxic workplace. I did not want to go to work, because I never knew what would happen."

Moffat was initially charged with one unjustified and number of discreditable practices under the Police Act. Later, she was mentioned with 11 allegations of fraud because she was supposed to reply in writing to PSB about her feelings against Fleck-Brezinsk.

Moffat was ultimately guilty of misconduct and two counts of fraud. There were still three counts of scams and one disobedience.

A lot of the conviction focused on whether police officers, who are often required to prove in court proceedings, can remain in the workplace after the conviction.

Kamins wrote that the service receives hundreds or complaints annually about its members and that the service must send a message that "it lies under the auspices of professional standards will not be allowed."

He added that Moffat, while acknowledging that he was guilty of some offenses, only fell on a "rubber sword" when she learned that her e-mail language was preserved in emails and thus proved she was lying Branch Professional Standards.

Postmedia came to Moffat and her lawyer, but she did not return with the press time. At the hearing, attorney Pat Nugent said that Moffat did not have a previous disciplinary record and that "he did not survive his usefulness as a policeman."

He argued that her conduct was not as uncertain as in other cases where officials remained at the workplace.

Source link