A new beginning or another version of life on Earth? – Technology News, Firstpost



[ad_1]

Returning documentary "National Geographic"Mars"Five years after we left the season 1: with the International Science Foundation Mars (IMSF) – a hypothetical agency that financed an expedition to Mars – announced that the fruits of their dogged work were paid out:" there It is life on Mars ".

This starts the next chapter of this interplanetary docu drama. The first human emigrants on the red planet in the small colony of Olympus are now building their ability to survive on Mars. Mars now hosts two people who are confronted with a man – scientists and industrialists.

The two-step season away from informative, documentary styles of telling the story of one more narrative, fiction style, reminiscent of more serious scientific films.

What will be needed for the settlement of Mars

While the first season focused primarily on the idea of ​​reaching Mars, the second season brings the challenges of life and mining to one, not two, sharp and desolate worlds. The show is set on both, in Mars and in the Arctic on Earth.

Season 2 is moving away from a literal comparison with the asteroid of the space station in the first season. Mars colonists compare with today's Arctic researchers what their mission requires. The lesser known life of Arctic scientists, miners and activists shown in the new season is truly interesting and one of the best moves from the whole series.

Deadland's space ship Martian crew standing high on the Martian scale. Image courtesy: National Geographic

Deadland's space ship Martian crew standing high on the Martian scale. Image courtesy: National Geographic

Mars is also described as a paradise for entrepreneurs, with beautiful parallels between the Red Planet and the Arctic.

Ironically, for a show called "Mars"The Planet itself is not characterized as a strong character, with its separate personality. The emphasis of this season is on people on both sides of the eternal battle of livelihood, greed, science and entrepreneurship.

The story largely depends on the diverse, contradictory ideas about what early years on Mars might look like. It calls for your curiosity about human plans for the colonization of the Red Planet – the "natural next step" to extend our existence to the solar system, as many scientists see.

The presentation beautifully describes some of the key issues of our endeavor to become an interplanetary kind: what are our intentions for Mars? How far are we willing to go? How much are we willing to give up in order to make this happen?

Some Martians gather in a rover strategy. Image courtesy: National Geographic

Mars colonists in the hill around the front of the rover Mars – are not alone. Image courtesy: National Geographic

Survival, essence and mining of red rocks

The pleasant adventure you have taken in the narrative of the first season is a more friendly and contemplative form. Dialogue with experts on survival and basic needs – resources, territory and power. And so that we would not forget that too well-known concept that the "planet would fight back if you push your borders."

Documentary and professional interviews are performed, and visual effects are predictable. Invented recreations are not nearly enough meat to attract your attention. Especially since we are spoiled for choosing when it comes to fictitious television and sci-fi. If you saw it Space (this is the best science-political drama), you know what I'm talking about.

However, the rivalry between the Space Agency, the IMSF and many of the poor mining companies, Lukram Industries, do not disappoint in the drama. In his opinion, they show a fair shot on both sides, which is pleasing to the engineers of the collective Marty's dream. The exhibition has left me to believe that there is more than one right way to colonize Mars, and no matter how we decide to do so, surprises are assured.

A new beginning or another version of life on Earth?

It is there with other pleasant parts of Mars that the introductory song, whose text responds with the mysterious, dark, predominantly path that whispers that "the heavens are a trick of light." I can not wonder: although we have idealized the future on Mars, the reality could be another version of life on Earth. Or will it be? Who knows?

The future of energy on Mars is solar energy, which takes place under this image of charging stations, built early in the early season by early colonists from Martia. Image courtesy: National Geographic.

The future of energy on Mars is solar and very SpaceX-ey, which runs through this image of charging stations built by the first human settlers on Mars. Image courtesy: National Geographic.

NASA also discusses new perspectives and space exploration with an extension. You are shown how research by the US Space Agency (and the largest part of its resources) is surprisingly used to study the Earth, making it more "survivable" for humans.

One would imagine that the semantic idea of ​​the colonization Mars would show you many new things. This exhibition does not. Of course, the experts explain the various aspects of the Mars mission and the exploration of the universe, but somehow let you want more.

It is shown to us how the colony looks on Mars, but not how the marine society of the future would function, as well as the small one. We have also shown what are all-embracing fights for us on a new and hostile planet, without telling us enough about who their heroes are, or why we should pay attention to what our plans for Mars are.

An extraordinary fictional narrative

The fabricated story also does not have a consistent theme of science. There are even a few gaps that the broadcast is swollen, so it remains unsettled. For example, the event does not explain how the return trip from Mars works – only that they are rare, but possible.

Predictably, Nat Geo's Mars is also a very American story. Of course, astronauts are from different countries, and international cooperation is always reflected in IMSF meetings. But the performance seems to be one-dimensional (read "American") that a human story happened.

Marseilles colonists work on a promising drill. Image courtesy: National Geographic

In the second season, capitalists and mining interests appear, and Mars is home to scientists and miners of the future. Here they are at the drilling site on Mars. Image courtesy: National Geographic

In the magnificent tradition of numerous space movies and television shows, Nat Geo is trying to make America again. But for us, fortunately, this is not something that disappoints, in fact, it can not be a broadcast with a wider appeal.

You probably will not be able to find a piece or writing that will breathe in this season. But moving parts in the second season are ideas – options. The performance is not simplified with any section of imagination.

It's not a win for sci-fi lovers

On the one hand it performs a good task of a difficult task – to be fair to both sides of the coin – our instincts for exploration and exploitation. On the other hand, it allows to a great extent to learn and realize a pleasant, modern science-fiction show.

After viewing epic perfectionism and attention to detail in the series, such as Space and realism, humor and charisma v Martian, it is sad that the fictional story is in Ljubljana Mars we simply can not stand alone without an attractive narration of our arctic courtyard.

Hardcore science and sci-fi lovers do not go in anticipation Space, but Battlestar Galactica. Mars is slower, contemplative, emotional and much lighter in the field of science than what we know it is unforgettable scientifically fantastic.

Our arctic circle is a key figure this season. Image courtesy: National Geographic

Our arctic circle is a key figure this season. Image courtesy: National Geographic

If you like the science-focused series, you'll probably like it. And it is much to love – visual, arctic narratives, thoughts of people who have much to gain (and lose) from the mission to colonize Mars. It is very likely that we will see a similar future by the end of the 2030s, which is why we are trying to present a likely scenario for this.

And now, when I wait to see what brings the third season, there is one thing I know now that I did not notice the second season Mars: Nat Geo has grown! The performance is nothing like Nat Geu, which I remember when I was younger – with stories about animals, earthquakes and planes.

Has Nat Geo grown up with me? But do I just notice?

[ad_2]

Source link